Grams.) The wedding from Mark MEEKS and you may Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

The guy ordered and you will increased here exactly what turned into his family into the next twenty-two many years as well as on this place all students was basically produced but both earliest. In the 1891 the guy offered that it domestic and you can ordered area 32 in the block 10 on the four miles northeast out of Chillicothe, that he enhanced and you can left due to the fact a house-stead.

Sworn so you can and you can licensed in advance of me, which twenty-first day of Oct

His Christian life lengthened thanks to a period of more forty years. He kept completely into Ancient Baptist believe, and this turned his whole comfort in his last months and also by brasiliansk brud one another precepts and analogy the guy illustrated the highest sorts of an enthusiastic American resident.

Mark MEEKS’ second relationship, to help you Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] was September 21, 1858 from inside the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. There’s nothing identified throughout the a married relationship to help you a COHEN other than the wedding permit, filed on Relationship Book step 1, page 914, suggestions the wedding due to the fact between elizabeth, and you will Sarah generated their particular mark. The wedding is performed by J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

I, T. T. KERLEY, carry out solemnly swear which i in the morning 21 yrs old, and therefore Miss W. C. MEEKS try 18/7 years old, which there are no courtroom objections to our Relationships. J. C. WELLS are pledged states that the moms and dads of Skip W. C. MEEKS have provided their full agree to the marriage of its daughter to help you Mr. T.

Sarah and you will Draw stayed west of Haynesville in Claiborne Parish having a little while together with probably just one child, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the latest spouse away from T. Most of the relatives details imply that Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY came to be November 29, 1865, from the Vow, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, and also the grave marker means a date out-of beginning out of 1865. I suggest, however, your day of delivery possess actually started November 31, 1863 instead of you to date within the 1865. Without a doubt, there’s absolutely no beginning certificate. The newest death certification is no let, as it implies a romantic date from delivery regarding November 29, 1886, over 5 years after the go out out of their own wedding. It can indicate a years from the death of 52, and because the fresh new death occurred January sixteen, 1919, she would was in fact born in 1866, deciding to make the 1886 almost certainly an excellent typographical error. In support of the many delivery time, We have around three objections:

• This new census taker in 1870, performing August 23, 1870, indicated that the little one’s age try 9. Whenever you are census takers try infamously bad from the many years, it is very unusual, I think, for the more youthful a child to own a delivery go out you to faraway. It can just be three years completely wrong to the remedied big date rather than 5 years completely wrong into 1965 go out. This new 1880 census taker noted the age since the 18, once more too-old to have often go out and you can wrong since just before their own matrimony, revealed lower than, when she wasn’t yet 18.
• Many big argument I have is the wedding licenses, copied verbatim on figure ?. There have been two alter into printed setting, the initial as the criteria your woman end up being at least to get yrs . old without parental agree, while the second becoming that the aside-old function was posted for use on the earliest about three digits of your date being “187”, which is crossed on reveal a romantic date out of Oct 21, 1881. Getting good November 29th birthday and start to become seventeen, the year away from beginning have to be 1863. In the event the she really was ten rather than about 1 month timid out-of eighteen, create the clerk possess accepted the definition of of your groom’s cousin that the bride’s parents accepted the wedding?